Page 66 از مقایسه Routers & Access Points

15 comparisons are ready for you on this page

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Xiaomi Mi Router 4C

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Xiaomi Mi Router 4C
USB Port	false	false
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	-
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Mercusys Mw306R

Mikrotik VS Mercusys

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Mercusys Mw306R
Size and Dimensions	-	34 * 115 * 147 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	true
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	-
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	-	true
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Tp Link Archer C50

Mikrotik VS Tp Link

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Tp Link Archer C50
Size and Dimensions	-	36.9 * 144.2 * 229.9 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	-	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	867 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Tp Link Archer C6 V328

Mikrotik VS Tp Link

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Tp Link Archer C6 V328
Size and Dimensions	-	32 * 117 * 215 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	Dual-core
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	-	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	867 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Tp Link Archer Ax23

Mikrotik VS Tp Link

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Tp Link Archer Ax23
Size and Dimensions	-	38.6 * 135 * 260.2 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	-
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	-	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	1200 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	574 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc vs Tp Link Archer Ax55

Mikrotik VS Tp Link

Feature	Mikrotik Hap Lite Tc	Tp Link Archer Ax55
Size and Dimensions	-	41 * 134.5 * 261.1 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	true
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	16MB Flash memory with 32MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor	Dual-core
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	-	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	2400 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	574 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison Tenda N301 vs Mercusys Mw306R

Tenda VS Mercusys

Feature	Tenda N301	Mercusys Mw306R
Size and Dimensions	26 * 90.5 * 127.4 millimeter (mm)	34 * 115 * 147 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	true
Port Forwarding Capability	true	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	true
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Tenda N301 vs Mercusys Mw325R V2

Tenda VS Mercusys

Feature	Tenda N301	Mercusys Mw325R V2
Size and Dimensions	26 * 90.5 * 127.4 millimeter (mm)	33 * 118 * 167 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	-	true
Port Forwarding Capability	true	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	-
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Tenda N301 vs Tenda F3

Tenda VS Tenda

Feature	Tenda N301	Tenda F3
Size and Dimensions	26 * 90.5 * 127.4 millimeter (mm)	31.2 * 118.4 * 185.6 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	false	false
Port Forwarding Capability	true	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	true
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	300 Mbps	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Xiaomi Mi Router 4A

Dlink VS Xiaomi

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Xiaomi Mi Router 4A
Size and Dimensions	-	100.5 * 175 * 188 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	true	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	-
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	16MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	-
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	867 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Tp Link Archer Ax55

Dlink VS Tp Link

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Tp Link Archer Ax55
Size and Dimensions	-	41 * 134.5 * 261.1 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	true	true
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	-	Dual-core
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	2400 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	574 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Tp Link Archer C50

Dlink VS Tp Link

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Tp Link Archer C50
Size and Dimensions	-	36.9 * 144.2 * 229.9 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	true	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	1 user per frequency band
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	-
Processor specifications	-	Quad-core Cortex A55 processor
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Port Triggering Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	true
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	867 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Tenda F3

Dlink VS Tenda

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Tenda F3
Size and Dimensions	-	31.2 * 118.4 * 185.6 millimeter (mm)
USB Port	true	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	-
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	-
Port Forwarding Capability	-	true
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	true
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Xiaomi Mi Router 4A Gigabit Edition

Dlink VS Xiaomi

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Xiaomi Mi Router 4A Gigabit Edition
USB Port	true	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	-
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	128MB RAM
Processor specifications	-	Dual-core
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	-
Maximum Bandwidth 5.0 GHz	-	867 Mbps
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	Dual-band

View Comparison Details

Comparison D Link Dir 825 vs Xiaomi Mi Router 4C

Dlink VS Xiaomi

Feature	D Link Dir 825	Xiaomi Mi Router 4C
USB Port	true	false
Guest Network Creation Capability	true	-
Memory Capacity	8MB Flash memory with 64MB RAM	-
Manual IP Configuration Option	true	-
Maximum Speed in 2.4 GHz Band	-	300 Mbps
Multi-band Capability	Dual-band	false

View Comparison Details