Price Comparison
No stores registered at this time
VS
No stores registered at this time
Rode Nt Usb Mini
VS
Funsnap Mic Tok
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | Wired | Wireless |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Studio | Lavalier |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Transmitter and microphone integrated with independent receiver |
| Microphone Technology Type | Electret condenser | Condenser |
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
| Optimal Operating Range | - | 80 meter (m) |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Metal | - |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | 54.5 * 89.3 * 141.9 millimeter (mm) | 17 x 19.2 x 54.8 mm (transmitter) / 11.2 x 23 x 75.6 mm (receiver) |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 585 gram (g) | 10 g (Transmitter) / 5 g (Receiver) |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 20-20000 hertz (hz) | 100-10000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Bitrate | 24 bit | 16 bit |
|---|---|---|
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio (S/N Ratio) | - | 63 decibel (db) |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | Less than 0.1% |
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Headphone Monitoring Output | 3.5mm jack | - |
|---|
Transmitter technical details
Transmitter technical details
| Transmitter Voltage and Current Consumption | - | 3.7 volt (v) |
|---|---|---|
| Transmitter Operating Time | - | Up to 6 hours |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Review Comparison
Rode Nt Usb Mini
User Rating Comparison
Rode Nt Usb Mini
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Funsnap Mic Tok
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
Your question will be displayed after approval
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Featured Reviews