Price Comparison
No stores registered at this time
VS
No stores registered at this time
Redragon Pulsar Gm303
VS
Fifine K667
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | Wired | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Desktop |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Without independent receiver and transmitter |
| Microphone Technology Type | Condenser | Condenser |
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Plastic | Metal |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | 90 * 90 * 165 millimeter (mm) | 54.8 * 137.9 millimeter (mm) |
|---|
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | 100-10000 hertz (hz) | 50-16000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 1.8 meter (m) | 1.4 meter (m) |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Monitoring Output | 3.5mm jack | - |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Microphone Impedance | 16 ohm (Ω) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Voltage and Current Consumption | - | 5 volt (v) |
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Review Comparison
Redragon Pulsar Gm303
User Rating Comparison
Redragon Pulsar Gm303
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Fifine K667
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
Your question will be displayed after approval
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Featured Reviews