Page 17 از مقایسه Beauty and Hygiene

15 comparisons are ready for you on this page

Comparison Philips Rq128517 vs Kemei Km 1948

Feature	Philips Rq128517	Kemei Km 1948
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Color Options	Green	-
Product Weight	-	220 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED display	Via LCD display
Line Cutting Capability	false	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	false
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Ergonomic	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Shaver	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Rotary	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	true	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	-
Battery Charging Time	60 minute (min)	-
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Technique of Device	Rotary cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Head Angle Adjustment	false	false
Maximum Battery Life	60 minute (min)	-
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Philips Sp9820 vs Vgr V 070

Philips VS VGR

Feature	Philips Sp9820	Vgr V 070
Body Material	Metallic	Metallic
Product Weight	-	252 gram (g)
Size and Dimensions	-	35 * 43 * 150 millimeter (mm)
Device Status Display	Via LED display	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	false
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Ergonomic	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Shaver	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Rotary	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	true	false
Connection Type	True Wireless	True Wireless
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	Lithium-Ion
Battery Charging Time	60 minute (min)	120 minute (min)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Technique of Device	Rotary cut	Direct cut
Display Type	true	true
Fast Charging Capability	true	false
Head Angle Adjustment	false	false
Maximum Battery Life	60 minute (min)	120 minute (min)
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Remington Mb4000 vs Vgr V 276

Remington VS VGR

Feature	Remington Mb4000	Vgr V 276
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Product Weight	163 gram (g)	250 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED display
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	true	true
Wet Shaving Capability	false	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Ergonomic
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Clipper
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Capacity	-	2500mAh
Battery Technology	-	Lithium-Ion
Power Source Type	Mains power	-
Battery Charging Time	-	3 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Size Range	0.4 to 18 mm	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Fast Charging Capability	false	false
Head Angle Adjustment	true	true
Maximum Battery Life	-	250 minute (min)
Water Resistance	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Remington Mb4000 vs Philips Mg375060

Remington VS Mg

Feature	Remington Mb4000	Philips Mg375060
Body Material	Plastic	Plastic
Product Weight	163 gram (g)	272 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	true	true
Wet Shaving Capability	false	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Technology	-	Lithium-Ion
Power Source Type	Mains power	-
Battery Charging Time	-	8 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Size Range	0.4 to 18 mm	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	false
Fast Charging Capability	false	true
Head Angle Adjustment	true	true
Maximum Battery Life	-	60 minute (min)
Number of Head Adjustment Steps	-	7 stages
Water Resistance	false	true

View Comparison Details

Comparison Philips Rq128517 vs Vgr V 134

Philips VS VGR

Feature	Philips Rq128517	Vgr V 134
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Color Options	Green	-
Product Weight	-	380 gram (g)
Size and Dimensions	-	45 * 60 * 185 millimeter (mm)
Device Status Display	Via LED display	Via LED display
Line Cutting Capability	false	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	true
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Ergonomic	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Shaver	Clipper
Clipper Classification	Rotary	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	true	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	Lithium-Ion
Battery Charging Time	60 minute (min)	3 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Advanced steel
Cutting Size Range	-	0.1 to 1.6 mm
Cutting Technique of Device	Rotary cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Head Angle Adjustment	false	true
Maximum Battery Life	60 minute (min)	5 hour (h)
Number of Head Adjustment Steps	-	0.1 to 1.6 mm
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Vgr V 691 vs Philips Mg775049

VGR VS Mg

Feature	Vgr V 691	Philips Mg775049
Body Material	Metallic	-
Color Options	Blue	-
Product Weight	480 gram (g)	-
Size and Dimensions	70 * 130 * 230 millimeter (mm)	-
Device Status Display	Via LED display	-
Line Cutting Capability	true	-
Shadow Cutting Capability	true	-
Wet Shaving Capability	false	-
Zero Cut Capability	true	-
Body Design Type	-	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	-	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	True Wireless	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	-
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	true	false
Head Angle Adjustment	true	false
Water Resistance	false	-

View Comparison Details

Comparison Kemei Km 1948 vs Philips Bt123314

Kemei VS Philips

Feature	Kemei Km 1948	Philips Bt123314
Body Material	Metallic	Plastic
Product Weight	220 gram (g)	-
Device Status Display	Via LCD display	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	false
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	true
Wet Shaving Capability	false	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	false
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Ergonomic
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Technology	-	Nickel-Metal Hydride
Battery Charging Time	-	8 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Blade width	-	32 millimeter (mm)
Cutting Size Range	-	1 to 7 mm
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	true	false
Fast Charging Capability	-	false
Head Angle Adjustment	false	true
Maximum Battery Life	-	30 minute (min)
Number of Head Adjustment Steps	-	7 stages
Water Resistance	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Kemei Km 5018 vs Vgr V 276

Kemei VS VGR

Feature	Kemei Km 5018	Vgr V 276
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Product Weight	160 gram (g)	250 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED display
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	true
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Ergonomic
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Clipper
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Capacity	-	2500mAh
Battery Technology	-	Lithium-Ion
Battery Charging Time	8 hour (h)	3 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Blade width	25 millimeter (mm)	-
Cutting Size Range	0.5 millimeter (mm)	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Fast Charging Capability	false	false
Head Angle Adjustment	false	true
Maximum Battery Life	50 minute (min)	250 minute (min)
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Braun 7899Cc vs Kemei Km 1948

Braun VS Kemei

Feature	Braun 7899Cc	Kemei Km 1948
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Product Weight	-	220 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LCD display
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	false
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	false	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Shaver	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Foil	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	true	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Blade Material	-	Stainless steel
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Head Angle Adjustment	false	false
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Remington Mb4000 vs Kemei Km 5021

Remington VS Kemei

Feature	Remington Mb4000	Kemei Km 5021
Body Material	Plastic	Plastic
Color Options	-	Blue
Product Weight	163 gram (g)	145 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	true	false
Wet Shaving Capability	false	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Power Source Type	Mains power	-
Battery Charging Time	-	8 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Size Range	0.4 to 18 mm	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	false
Fast Charging Capability	false	false
Head Angle Adjustment	true	false
Maximum Battery Life	-	60 minute (min)
Water Resistance	false	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Braun Mgk3220 vs Philips Mg375060

Mg VS Mg

Feature	Braun Mgk3220	Philips Mg375060
Body Material	Plastic	Plastic
Product Weight	150 gram (g)	272 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	true
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	Lithium-Ion
Battery Charging Time	10 hour (h)	8 hour (h)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Size Range	0.5 to 21 mm	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	false
Fast Charging Capability	false	true
Head Angle Adjustment	false	true
Maximum Battery Life	50 minute (min)	60 minute (min)
Number of Head Adjustment Steps	-	7 stages
Water Resistance	true	true

View Comparison Details

Comparison Braun Mgk3220 vs Gemei Gm 6008

Mg VS Gemei

Feature	Braun Mgk3220	Gemei Gm 6008
Body Material	Plastic	Plastic
Color Options	-	White
Product Weight	150 gram (g)	400 gram (g)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LCD display
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	true
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	true	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Ergonomic
Clipper Class	Trimmer	Clipper
Clipper Classification	Single linear blade	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	false	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)
Battery Capacity	-	2000mAh
Battery Technology	Lithium-Ion	-
Battery Charging Time	10 hour (h)	180 minute (min)
Blade Material	Stainless steel	Stainless steel
Cutting Size Range	0.5 to 21 mm	-
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Fast Charging Capability	false	false
Head Angle Adjustment	false	true
Maximum Battery Life	50 minute (min)	60 minute (min)
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Remington AC8605 vs Mac Styler Mc 6688

Remington VS Mac Styler

Feature	Remington AC8605	Mac Styler Mc 6688
Cord Length	3 meter (m)	2.5 meter (m)
Product Weight	700 gram (g)	-
Size and Dimensions	-	26 * 4.5 * 23 centimeter (cm)
Material	ABS Plastic	ABS Plastic
Device Performance	Belt drive (direct drive often implied if "تسمه‌ای" is absent)	Belt drive (direct drive often implied if "تسمه‌ای" is absent)
Element Material	Ceramic	Ceramic
Foldable Handle Feature	-	false
Hair Dryer Design Type	Regular / Normal (Hair Styler)	Regular / Normal (Hair Styler)
Motor Power Range	65 and 90 Watts	65 and 90 Watts
Motor Type	AC (heavy-duty motor)	AC (heavy-duty motor)
Cold Air Setting Button	true	true
Ion Enhancer System	true	true
Maximum Air Blowing Speed	-	110 km/h
Types of Airflow Modes	2 modes (low, high)	2 modes (low, high)
Types of Heat Airflow Modes	3 modes (cool, gentle, hot)	3 modes (cool, gentle, hot)
Voltage Amount	220-240 volt (v)	220 volt (v)

View Comparison Details

Comparison Braun 7899Cc vs Vgr V 070

Braun VS VGR

Feature	Braun 7899Cc	Vgr V 070
Body Material	Plastic	Metallic
Product Weight	-	252 gram (g)
Size and Dimensions	-	35 * 43 * 150 millimeter (mm)
Device Status Display	Via LED indicator	Via LED indicator
Line Cutting Capability	true	true
Shadow Cutting Capability	false	false
Wet Shaving Capability	true	false
Zero Cut Capability	false	true
Body Design Type	Regular/Normal	Regular/Normal
Clipper Class	Shaver	Trimmer
Clipper Classification	Foil	Single linear blade
Movable Head Series	true	false
Connection Type	Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device)	True Wireless
Battery Technology	-	Lithium-Ion
Battery Charging Time	-	120 minute (min)
Blade Material	-	Stainless steel
Cutting Technique of Device	Direct cut	Direct cut
Display Type	false	true
Fast Charging Capability	-	false
Head Angle Adjustment	false	false
Maximum Battery Life	-	120 minute (min)
Water Resistance	true	false

View Comparison Details

Comparison Enzo En 8869 vs Mac Styler Mc 6688

Enzo VS Mac Styler

Feature	Enzo En 8869	Mac Styler Mc 6688
Cord Length	2.7 meter (m)	2.5 meter (m)
Product Weight	750 gram (g)	-
Size and Dimensions	-	26 * 4.5 * 23 centimeter (cm)
Material	ABS Plastic	ABS Plastic
Device Performance	Belt drive (direct drive often implied if "تسمه‌ای" is absent)	Belt drive (direct drive often implied if "تسمه‌ای" is absent)
Element Material	Ceramic - Titanium	Ceramic
Foldable Handle Feature	-	false
Hair Dryer Design Type	Regular / Normal (Hair Styler)	Regular / Normal (Hair Styler)
Motor Power Range	1500 to 3000 Watts	65 and 90 Watts
Motor Type	AC (heavy-duty motor)	AC (heavy-duty motor)
Cold Air Setting Button	true	true
Ion Enhancer System	true	true
Maximum Air Blowing Speed	-	110 km/h
Types of Airflow Modes	2 modes (low, high)	2 modes (low, high)
Types of Heat Airflow Modes	3 modes (cool, gentle, hot)	3 modes (cool, gentle, hot)
Voltage Amount	220-240 volt (v)	220 volt (v)

View Comparison Details