Price Comparison
No stores registered at this time
VS
No stores registered at this time
Redragon Gm99 Stix
VS
Hyperx Quadcast
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | Wired | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| Microphone Type by Application | Desktop | Desktop |
| Transmitter/Receiver Combination | Without independent receiver and transmitter | Without independent receiver and transmitter |
| Microphone Technology Type | Condenser | Electret condenser |
| Number of Microphones | 1 piece | 1 piece |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Plastic | Metal |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Size and Dimensions | 80.4 * 93.2 * 250.5 millimeter (mm) | 103.1 x 129 x 249.9 mm (microphone and stand) |
|---|---|---|
| Product Weight | 162 gram (g) | 712 g (Microphone & Stand) |
Aesthetic and supplementary features
Aesthetic and supplementary features
| Microphone Cable Length | 1.8 meter (m) | 2.9 meter (m) |
|---|---|---|
| Headphone Monitoring Output | - | 3.5mm jack |
Technical details of the microphone
Technical details of the microphone
| Microphone Voltage and Current Consumption | 5 volt (v) | - |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragm diameter size | - | 14 millimeter (mm) |
| Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) | - | Less than 0.05% |
Technical features
Technical features
| Frequency Response Range | - | 20-20000 hertz (hz) |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Review Comparison
Redragon Gm99 Stix
User Rating Comparison
Redragon Gm99 Stix
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Hyperx Quadcast
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
Your question will be displayed after approval
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Featured Reviews