Price Comparison
No stores registered at this time
VS
No stores registered at this time
Kemei Km 1948
VS
Xiaomi Mi Electric Shaver S500
Feature Comparison
Main features
Main features
| Connection Type | Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device) | Wireless (detachable cable for wireless use of the device) |
|---|
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Body Material | Metallic | Plastic |
|---|
General features
General features
| Clipper Classification | Single linear blade | Rotary |
|---|---|---|
| Clipper Class | Trimmer | Shaver |
| Body Design Type | Regular/Normal | Regular/Normal |
| Movable Head Series | No | Yes |
Technical features
Technical features
| Cutting Technique of Device | Direct cut | Rotary cut |
|---|---|---|
| Blade Material | Stainless steel | Stainless steel |
| Display Type | Yes | Yes |
| Head Angle Adjustment | No | No |
| Water Resistance | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging Capability | - | Yes |
| Battery Charging Time | - | 90 minute (min) |
| Maximum Battery Life | - | 60 minute (min) |
Capabilities
Capabilities
| Device Status Display | Via LCD display | Via LED display |
|---|---|---|
| Zero Cut Capability | Yes | No |
| Line Cutting Capability | Yes | No |
| Shadow Cutting Capability | No | No |
| Wet Shaving Capability | No | Yes |
Aesthetic features
Aesthetic features
| Product Weight | 220 gram (g) | 345 gram (g) |
|---|
Disclaimer: Information on this page may need review. If you notice any discrepancies, please report them
User Review Comparison
Kemei Km 1948
User Rating Comparison
Kemei Km 1948
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Xiaomi Mi Electric Shaver S500
0.0
/10
from total 1 Vote
Questions and Answers About This Comparison
Your question will be displayed after approval
No questions have been asked about this comparison yet.
Be the first to ask a question!
Featured Reviews